首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative analysis of the anterior and posterior length and deflection angle of the cranial base, in individuals with facial pattern I, II and III
【2h】

Comparative analysis of the anterior and posterior length and deflection angle of the cranial base, in individuals with facial pattern I, II and III

机译:I,II和III型面部个体的颅底前后长度和偏转角的比较分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: This study evaluated the variations in the anterior cranial base (S-N), posterior cranial base (S-Ba) and deflection of the cranial base (SNBa) among three different facial patterns (Pattern I, II and III). Method: A sample of 60 lateral cephalometric radiographs of Brazilian Caucasian patients, both genders, between 8 and 17 years of age was selected. The sample was divided into 3 groups (Pattern I, II and III) of 20 individuals each. The inclusion criteria for each group were the ANB angle, Wits appraisal and the facial profile angle (G’.Sn.Pg’). To compare the mean values obtained from (SNBa, S-N, S-Ba) each group measures, the ANOVA test and Scheffé’s Post-Hoc test were applied. Results and Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference for the deflection angle of the cranial base among the different facial patterns (Patterns I, II and III). There was no significant difference for the measures of the anterior and posterior cranial base between the facial Patterns I and II. The mean values for S-Ba were lower in facial Pattern III with statistically significant difference. The mean values of S-N in the facial Pattern III were also reduced, but without showing statistically significant difference. This trend of lower values in the cranial base measurements would explain the maxillary deficiency and/or mandibular prognathism features that characterize the facial Pattern III.
机译:目的:本研究评估了三种不同面部模式(模式I,II和III)的前颅底(S-N),后颅底(S-Ba)和颅底(SNBa)的变化。方法:选取60例巴西高加索患者的60头侧位X线片,男女年龄在8至17岁之间。将样品分为3组(模式I,II和III),每组20个人。每组的入选标准为ANB角,Wits评估和面部轮廓角(G’.Sn.Pg’)。为了比较从(SNBa,S-N,S-Ba)各组测量获得的平均值,应用了ANOVA测试和Scheffé的Post-Hoc测试。结果与结论:不同面部模式(模式I,II和III)的颅底偏转角没有统计学差异。 I型和II型的前颅底和后颅底的测量没有显着差异。面部模式III中S-Ba的平均值较低,具有统计学差异。面部模式III中S-N的平均值也降低了,但未显示出统计学上的显着差异。颅底测量值降低的趋势将解释上颌骨缺损和/或下颌前突特征,这些特征是面部III型特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号